AirTA

The State of English in Japan Hiring (2026)

What 34,910 job postings at 1,135 employers ask for in English, matched against the TOEIC operator’s own data on who can deliver it.

What Employers Actually Ask

Across 32,715 postings with a readable description, 67.0% state no English requirement at all. Another 19.0% ask for some working English, and 14.0% ask for business-level spoken English or above, counting preferred as well as required mentions.

Demand concentrates hard. Pharmaceutical postings ask for business English at 36%, with life-science tools close behind at 34%. Japan’s domestic service employers barely ask, with retail at 3.4%, construction at 1.0%, and transportation at 1.5%.

  • Pharmaceutical

    1,606 postings

    35.9%

  • Life-science tools

    175 postings

    33.7%

  • Automotive

    762 postings

    27.8%

  • Banking

    523 postings · MUFG is 70% of this denominator

    27.7%

  • Logistics & supply chain

    203 postings

    26.1%

  • Securities & asset management

    449 postings

    25.4%

  • Medical device

    851 postings

    24.6%

  • Telecommunications

    295 postings

    23.7%

  • Chemicals & materials

    664 postings

    23.5%

  • Internet & e-commerce

    2,061 postings

    22.7%

Show all 30 industries
  • Electrical & electronics

    2,503 postings

    17.5%

  • Machinery & heavy equipment

    879 postings · Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is 60% of this denominator

    14.2%

  • Insurance

    429 postings

    14.2%

  • Finance & fintech

    546 postings

    14.1%

  • Tourism & hospitality

    973 postings · Daiwa House Realty Management is 45% of this denominator

    13.5%

  • Manufacturing (diversified)

    389 postings

    12.3%

  • Consumer goods

    354 postings

    12.2%

  • IT & software

    7,416 postings

    11.5%

  • Real estate

    290 postings

    11.4%

  • Energy & utilities

    280 postings

    10.7%

  • Media, advertising & PR

    1,021 postings

    7.8%

  • Professional services

    2,630 postings

    7.3%

  • Entertainment & gaming

    2,413 postings

    6.9%

  • Food & beverage

    1,070 postings

    6.8%

  • Education & edtech

    384 postings

    5.0%

  • Healthcare services

    735 postings

    4.6%

  • Retail

    1,788 postings · Ain Holdings is 56% of this denominator

    3.4%

  • Digital health

    238 postings

    2.9%

  • Transportation

    195 postings · Newmo is 43% of this denominator

    1.5%

  • Construction

    384 postings

    1.0%

Industries with at least 150 postings carrying an English band. A Japanese-language posting silent on English counts as no requirement stated, never as a requirement; English-language postings silent on English are excluded rather than guessed. Concentrated denominators are named in each row.

The Number in the Posting

2,607 live postings from 259 companies name a TOEIC score. The most common bar by posting count is 600; 800, which roughly one corporate test-taker in nine clears, is named by the most companies.

Counted by company instead of by posting, 600, 700, and 800 are named about equally often, with 730 and 750 close behind. The steepest bar named by more than a dozen companies is 860, and about one corporate test-taker in seventeen clears it.

  • TOEIC 900

    29 postings · 18 companies

    3.2% clear

  • TOEIC 860

    68 postings · 17 companies

    5.9% clear

  • TOEIC 850

    39 postings · 28 companies

    6.7% clear

  • TOEIC 800

    596 postings · 111 companies

    11.3% clear

  • TOEIC 750

    128 postings · 53 companies

    16.9% clear

  • TOEIC 730

    244 postings · 62 companies

    19.4% clear

  • TOEIC 700

    344 postings · 110 companies

    23.4% clear

  • TOEIC 650

    262 postings · 47 companies

    30.9% clear

  • TOEIC 600

    656 postings · 96 companies

    39.1% clear

  • TOEIC 550

    35 postings · 13 companies

    47.7% clear

  • TOEIC 500

    158 postings · 38 companies

    56.2% clear

Bar length shows how many postings name each score; a posting that names more than one score is counted at the highest. The percentage is the share of the corporate test-taking cohort at or above that score, derived from the published distribution by linear interpolation within a 50-point bin.

The Test Companies Screen With Is Not the Skill They Are Buying

Job descriptions describe speaking: leading meetings, presenting, negotiating. TOEIC Listening & Reading, the test nearly every company screens with, measures neither speaking nor writing.

IIBC crosswalks the two tests across roughly 348,000 people who took both. People scoring 800 to 895 on Listening & Reading average 131.4 out of 200 on the speaking test, which IIBC’s own descriptors place in the range where, “at least part of the time, the reasons for, or explanations of, the opinion are unclear to a listener.” Even the 900-plus group averages 150.5, the top of that same level. A TOEIC 800 requirement buys a strong reader, and on average it does not buy someone who can argue a position in English.

Average speaking and writing scores by Listening & Reading band, both out of 200. The dashed lines mark IIBC’s speaking level boundaries: from 130 to 150, “at least part of the time, the reasons for, or explanations of, the opinion are unclear to a listener”; from 160 to 180, test-takers “can express opinions or respond to complicated requests effectively.”

Demand Against Supply, Industry by Industry

Where our industry definitions map one-to-one onto IIBC’s, the two sides go on one chart. Japan’s export manufacturers ask far beyond their tested pools, and the domestic service industries barely draw on theirs.

Automotive is the widest gap, asking for business English in 28% of postings in an industry where 6.5% of the tested workforce clears the bar. Pharma asks even more often but draws on one of the deepest pools in the dataset, so its ratio is lower.

Blue is the share of postings asking for business-level English. Slate is the estimated share of that industry’s corporate test-takers at or above TOEIC 795. The two shares use different denominators, so a wide gap describes hiring tension, never a headcount shortfall.

English Requirements Increase With Seniority

Among the roughly one in five postings whose title states an explicit level, business-English demand rises from 6% at entry level to 60% at director.

The salary premium survives inside every level, which is the check that matters. Comparing postings of the same level, those that state any English requirement carry a higher median than those that state none, so the premium is a price on the skill and not just a shadow of seniority.

  • Entry

    819 postings

    6.1%

  • Junior

    230 postings

    28.7%

  • Senior

    1,090 postings

    29.8%

  • Lead

    1,802 postings

    19.9%

  • Manager

    2,047 postings

    32.7%

  • Principal

    113 postings

    50.4%

  • VP

    62 postings

    50.0%

  • Director

    442 postings

    60.0%

LevelNo English statedAny English statedPremium
Entry & junior¥5,000,000 (n=460)¥7,080,000 (n=100)+42%
Senior & lead¥8,750,000 (n=944)¥9,550,000 (n=285)+9%
Manager and above¥9,000,000 (n=402)¥10,500,000 (n=191)+17%

Median stated-salary midpoints within each level group, comparing postings with no stated English requirement against postings stating any English requirement. Medians are rounded to the nearest ¥10,000.

Postings whose title carries an explicit level marker, about 21% of the banded corpus. Untitled levels are excluded rather than guessed.

Foreign-Capital Employers Set the English Bar

Foreign-capital employers ask for business-level English in 37.5% of postings. Domestic employers ask for it in 7.8%, a nearly five-fold difference.

Foreign-capital companies write 21% of the postings in this corpus but 55% of all its business-English demand. The salary data shows a premium on both sides: at domestic employers a posting that states English carries an 18% median premium, and at foreign-capital employers the premium is 31% on a much smaller disclosed sample.

37.5%

476 companies · 6,760 postings

7.8%

616 companies · 25,885 postings

Browse English-friendly jobs at foreign companies

A company counts as foreign-capital when its ultimate controlling group is headquartered outside Japan. Japan-listed companies with a foreign minority shareholder count as domestic. Labels were assigned for 1,092 employers; 5 companies are not yet classified and are excluded.

Where the Supply Actually Comes From

Time lived in an English-speaking country separates people further than industry or job function. About 65% of corporate test-takers have never lived abroad, and 8.2% of that group clears a business bar.

Capability also concentrates at the entry gate. Candidates tested before joining average 639, higher than every cohort already inside the company. The data is cross-sectional, so it says nothing about individuals improving or declining over time.

  • Never lived abroad

    240,450 test-takers

    8.2%

  • Less than 6 months

    96,400 test-takers

    18.6%

  • 6 months to 1 year

    12,731 test-takers

    36.1%

  • 1 to 2 years

    6,381 test-takers

    35.6%

  • More than 2 years

    13,114 test-takers

    41.9%

Estimated share of corporate test-takers at or above TOEIC 795, by self-reported time lived in a country where English is the main language. FY2025, corporate institutional testing.

What English Pays

Among the 15,935 postings that state a usable salary, the median midpoint is ¥7,000,000 where no English is required and ¥8,250,000 where any working level is stated.

Nine industries have enough salary disclosure to compare within the industry. The business-English premium runs from 52% in pharmaceuticals down to −16% in entertainment and gaming, and automotive, the industry that asks furthest beyond its pool, sits at 8%. These are premiums on disclosed pay, and industries that rarely state a salary are not represented.

Stated requirementPostingsMedian salary midpoint
No English requirement stated12,979¥7,000,000
Some English asked for1,896¥8,250,000
Business-level spoken English asked for1,060¥8,250,000
IndustryNo EnglishBusiness EnglishPremium
Pharmaceutical¥5,250,000 (n=301)¥8,000,000 (n=104)+52%
Medical device¥6,000,000 (n=112)¥8,000,000 (n=58)+33%
Professional services¥7,000,000 (n=1411)¥8,600,000 (n=45)+23%
Electrical & electronics¥7,250,000 (n=880)¥8,550,000 (n=188)+18%
IT & software¥8,000,000 (n=3741)¥9,000,000 (n=240)+12%
Automotive¥7,250,000 (n=217)¥7,820,000 (n=75)+8%
Chemicals & materials¥7,500,000 (n=193)¥8,000,000 (n=69)+7%
Machinery & heavy equipment¥7,250,000 (n=306)¥7,500,000 (n=57)+3%
Entertainment & gaming¥7,000,000 (n=1092)¥5,850,000 (n=38)−16%

Salary is the midpoint of the posting’s stated range; medians are rounded to the nearest ¥10,000. Company-average boilerplate, inverted ranges, and midpoints outside ¥2,500,000 to ¥30,000,000 were rejected before computing.

How to Read This Data

  • Both sides are shares, never headcounts. Demand is a share of postings and supply is a share of test-takers, so neither is a share of the workforce.
  • English requirements are extracted from posting text by deterministic rules and published at a three-way grain: none stated, some, business level and above. On 190 hand-labeled postings the grouping agrees about 90% after the rules were tuned on them, and about 80% on postings the rules had never seen. Fewer than one banded posting in fifty carries an earlier model-read label instead. Finer distinctions do not survive out-of-sample checks, so this report never publishes them.
  • A posting counts as asking for English when it states a level or describes English in use, and preferred or welcome mentions count alongside required ones. About one business-level posting in five is a preferred mention.
  • The supply denominator is corporate institutional testing, the population employers actually test. Self-paid test-takers score about 110 points higher and would understate every gap.
  • Coverage follows machine-readable career sites. Several of Japan’s domestic giants run bespoke career pages no crawler can read, so a thin industry here reflects what is readable, never proof that the industry is not hiring.
  • No trend claims. The posting corpus began in July 2026, and IIBC publishes segmented data for single years.

Cite This Report

Free to quote with credit to AirTA and a link to this page.

Citation
Source: AirTA, "The State of English in Japan Hiring (2026)" (September 2026), https://airta.jp/reports/state-of-english-hiring-japan
Link (HTML)
<a href="https://airta.jp/reports/state-of-english-hiring-japan">AirTA, &quot;The State of English in Japan Hiring (2026)&quot;</a>

Sources: AirTA corpus of 34,910 active postings on 1,135 employers’ careers sites in Japan, read 21 October 2026, of which 32,715 carry a readable description. IIBC, TOEIC Program Data & Analysis 2026, FY2025 data, corporate institutional cohort of 424,158 test-takers. Segment supply shares are derived from published means and the corporate score distribution, so single-point figures are approximate.

Start Your First Search on AirTA

Post a job as a talent acquisition team, or create an agency account and submit your first proposal after being approved. Fees, timelines, and terms stay visible to both sides from day one.